<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://www.videri.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Samikhondker</id>
		<title>Videri - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.videri.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Samikhondker"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Samikhondker"/>
		<updated>2026-04-04T09:53:30Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.24.1</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4333</id>
		<title>Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4333"/>
				<updated>2018-10-25T03:02:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samikhondker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox book&lt;br /&gt;
| name           = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America&lt;br /&gt;
| image          = [[File:Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America.jpg|200px|alt=Cover]]&lt;br /&gt;
| image_caption  = Book Cover&lt;br /&gt;
| author         = Elizabeth Fraterrigo&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher      = Oxford University Press&lt;br /&gt;
| pub_date       = October 8, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| pages          = 308 pages&lt;br /&gt;
| isbn           = 978-0199832453&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Playboy magazine is an icon in American culture when talking about sexuality. Notable actresses, singers, and other celebrities such as Marilyn Monroe, Pamela Anderson, Madonna, Farrah Fawcett, the late Anna Nicole Smith, and Kim Kardashian have graced the center folds of the magazine either nude or semi-nude while starting out or at the top of their careers. However, Playboy&amp;#039;s impact on American culture goes beyond just pictures of naked women men liked to look and fantasize about. Elizabeth Fraterrigo’s Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America explores and explains the impact Playboy magazine had not only on exploration of sexuality, but also how it challenged post war ideal of domestic bliss of the 1950s. Playboy magazine advocated for the pleasures of bachelorhood, working hard for play and leisure, living the “good life”, redefining gender roles, and enjoying pre-marital sex with sexually available women who were also not looking to settle down anytime soon either, all while criticizing the conformist ideals of a “happy” family life in the suburbs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraterrigo starts off talking about Hugh Hefner&amp;#039;s, the found of Playboy magazine, background. Like most men in who served in World War II, Hefner eventually left military service at the age of 20, went to college, married his college sweetheart, moved into the suburbs, and had a child with his wife. However, Hefner had an unsettling feeling of disappointment and unfulfillment in his life trying to conform to postwar societal standards. In the late 1940s and 50s, population growth and rise of subarea emphasized the importance of conforming to the new world of the Atomic age. The ideal mainstreamed American lifestyle was to get married young, buy a house in the suburbs, have 2.5 children, where men working a 9-5 office jobs while their wives stayed home to clean and raise their children, then expected to have a warm cooked meal by 6 for her husband and kids to eat. Those who did not follow this norm were looked down upon or shunned from society. However, many men and women, like Hefner, were unsatisfied with the constant cycle of uneventful domestic bliss. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually, Hefner was tired of working a desk job when his passion was to be a cartoonist for newspapers and magazines. Hefner published Playboy magazine in 1953, with the famous Marilyn Monroe as the first ever center-fold. While the magazine’s naked photos of Monroe and other playboy models shocked conservative members of society, those who looked past the pictures and read articles realized that Playboy wasn’t just promoting sexuality, but also individuality in a conformist society. Articles, advertisements, and pictures promoted the “good life”, where men worked and lived in the city, had taste in the finer things in life like good food, fashion, and interior designing and could entice any women with these taste into bed, like the famous James Bond. Men who worked hard enough could live this good life in the city because all the money he makes would be spent on himself and his own pleasure, promoting consumerism and helping the American economy. Also, the idea of being able to take home a beautiful woman to bed by using charm and taste in the finer thing seemed more appealing than stressing about going home to take care of a family. Playboy depicted the urban city life as a man’s world where suburbia became a women’s world, controlled by wives who threaten the power of masculinity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hefner challenge the taboo of the public discussion and expression of sexuality. Hefner’s target audience were young single men who had no plans to settle down but still wanted to enjoy the pleasures of sex. Playboy&amp;#039;s challenge against pre-marital sex was supported with the idea that sexual fulfillment will eventually lead to happier marriages when one is ready to settle down. With new scientific research and technology, pregnancy and STI weren’t huge concerns anymore, promoting the enjoyments of sex between men and women without worrying about any consequences. Helen Brown’s “Single Girl” was the equivalent to Hefner’s Playboy. The Single Girl was an independent woman with a career, who could take care of herself, sexually available, and was not looking to settle down and get married anytime soon. Instead, Brown insists the Single Girl’s role in society, and at work, was to be the sexual appeal for available and unavailable men. This new wave of feminist lead to women being open to freely their sexuality, and unapologetic using their sex appeal to get further in life, either for personal or professional reasons. However, as much the Single Girl was career oriented and independent, she was always supposed to be in a submissive role to men in the work force and society so they didn’t threaten the power of masculinity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually though, all good things come to an end. Playboy’s decline was aided criticisms of the lack of racial diversity, 3rd wave feminist, and decline sales. While the ideal of the good life seemed obtainable to white, middle class men in or recent graduated from college, black men did not have the same opportunities to try and reach the same life style. Discrimination against African Americans in society were still prominent in society, and minorities where not in the forefront of Hefner’s mind as a target audience. While there were some copycat magazines similar to Playboy meant for the black communities, none reach the same success and failed with a few years of publications. Critics also argued the lack of diversity in what kind of women were showcased in the magazine. Most playmates and cover girls were young, white women, with the occasional “exotic” model that was fitting in for some sort of fetish for men. Other critics were the new waves of feminist on the late 70s and 80s. These new wave feminists criticize Playboy for using women as sexual object and setting beauty standards that were unrealistic and unobtainable beauty and sexual standards to the modern women of America. The new Reagan-Era conservatism also criticize and blamed Playboy for influencing the rise of teen pregnancy, spreading of new STIs like AIDS, and higher rates of sexual violence against women, including the violent murder of Dorothy Stratten, a Playboy Playmate and Playmate of the Year, who died at the age of 20 by the hands of her husband and manager. With so much negative media and controversy surrounding Playboy, Hefner then attempting to appease the critics by changing certain things in the magazine. However, by then, Playboy had lost its original exciting appeal in challenging societal norms to being criticized of creating even worse cultural norms. Playboys impact in society for the last 60+ years will always be remember in American culture in the 20th and 21st century as a pivotal role in challenging then being challenge for their idea of “the good life”.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samikhondker</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4332</id>
		<title>Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4332"/>
				<updated>2018-10-25T02:55:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samikhondker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox book&lt;br /&gt;
| name           = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America&lt;br /&gt;
| image          = [[File:Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America.jpg|200px|alt=Cover]]&lt;br /&gt;
| image_caption  = Book Cover&lt;br /&gt;
| author         = Elizabeth Fraterrigo&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher      = Oxford University Press&lt;br /&gt;
| pub_date       = October 8, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| pages          = 308 pages&lt;br /&gt;
| isbn           = 978-0199832453&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Playboy magazine is an icon in American culture when talking about sexuality. Notable actresses, singers, and other celebrities such as Marilyn Monroe, Pamela Anderson, Madonna, Farrah Fawcett, the late Anna Nicole Smith, and Kim Kardashian have graced the center folds of the magazine either nude or semi-nude while starting out or at the top of their careers. But Playboy magazine impact on American culture goes beyond just naked pictures of naked women men liked to look and fantasize about. Elizabeth Fraterrigo’s Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America explores and explains the impact Playboy magazine had not only on exploration of sexuality, but also how it challenged post war ideal of domestic bliss of the 1950s. Playboy magazine advocated for the pleasures of bachelorhood, working hard for play and leisure, living the “good life”, redefining gender roles, and enjoying pre-marital sex with sexually available women who were also not looking to settle down anytime soon either, all while criticizing the conformist ideals of a “happy” family life in the suburbs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraterrigo starts off with Hugh Hefner, the found of Playboy magazine, background. Like most men in who served in the war, Hefner eventually left military service at the age of 20, went to college, married his college sweetheart, moved into the suburbs with family after marriage and had a child with his wife. However, Hefner had an unsettling feeling of disappointment and unfulfillment in his life trying to conform to postwar societal standards. In the late 1940s and 50s, population growth and rise of subarea emphasis the importance of conforming to the new world of the Atomic age. The ideal mainstreamed happy life was to get married young, buy a house in the suburbs, have 2.5 children, men working a 9-5 office jobs while their wives stayed home to clean, and raise their children, and expected to have a warm cooked meal by 6 for her husband and kids. Those who did not follow this norm were looked down upon or shunned from society. However, many men and women, like Hefner, were unsatisfied with the constant cycle of uneventful domestic bliss. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually, Hefner was tired of working a desk job while his passion was to be a cartoonist for newspapers and magazines. Hefner published Playboy magazine in 1953, with the famous Marilyn Monroe as the first ever center-fold. While the magazine’s naked photos of Monroe and other playboy models shocked conservative members of society, those who looked past the pictures and read articles realized that Playboy wasn’t just promoting sexuality, but also individuality in a conformist society. Articles, advertisements, and pictures promoted the “good life”, where men worked and lived in the city, had taste in the finer things in life like good food, fashion, and interior designing and could entice any women with these skills into bed, like the famous James Bond. Men who worked hard enough could live this good life in the city because all the money he makes would be spent on himself and his own pleasure, promoting consumerism and helping the American economy. Also, the idea of being able to take home a beautiful woman to bed by using charm and taste in the finer thing seemed more appealing than stressing about going home to take care of a family. Playboy depicted the urban city life as a man’s world where suburbia became a women’s world, controlled by wives who threaten the power of masculinity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hefner challenge the taboo of the public discussion and expression of sexuality. Hefner’s target audience were young single men who had no plans to settle down but still wanted to enjoy the pleasures of sex. Playboy challenge against pre-marital sex was supported with the idea that sexual fulfillment will eventually lead to happier marriages when one is ready to settle down. With new scientific research and technology, pregnancy and STI weren’t huge concerns anymore, promoting the enjoyments of sex between men and women without worrying about any consequences. Helen Brown’s “Single Girl” was the equivalent to Hefner’s Playboy. The Single Girl was an independent woman with a career, who could take care of herself, sexually available, and was not looking to settle down and get married anytime soon. Instead, Brown insists the Single Girl’s role in society, and at work, was to be the sexual appeal for available and unavailable men. This new wave of feminist lead to women being open to freely their sexuality, and unapologetic using their sex appeal to get further in life, either for personal or professional reasons. However, as much the Single Girl was career oriented and independent, she was always supposed to be in a submissive role to men in the work force and society so they didn’t threaten the power of masculinity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually though, all good things come to an end. Playboy’s decline was aided criticisms of the lack of racial diversity, 3rd wave feminist, and decline sales. While the ideal of the good life seemed obtainable to white, middle class men in or recent graduated from college, black men did not have the same opportunities to try and reach the same life style. Discrimination against African Americans in society were still prominent in society, and minorities where not in the forefront of Hefner’s mind as a target audience. While there were some copycat magazines similar to Playboy meant for the black communities, none reach the same success and failed with a few years of publications. Critics also argued the lack of diversity in what kind of women were showcased in the magazine. Most playmates and cover girls were young, white women, with the occasional “exotic” model that was fitting in for some sort of fetish for men. Other critics were the new waves of feminist on the late 70s and 80s. These new wave feminists criticize Playboy for using women as sexual object and setting beauty standards that were unrealistic and unobtainable beauty and sexual standards to the modern women of America. The new Reagan-Era conservatism also criticize and blamed Playboy for influencing the rise of teen pregnancy, spreading of new STIs like AIDS, and higher rates of sexual violence against women, including the violent murder of Dorothy Stratten, a Playboy Playmate and Playmate of the Year, who died at the age of 20 by the hands of her husband and manager. With so much negative media and controversy surrounding Playboy, Hefner then attempting to appease the critics by changing certain things in the magazine. However, by then, Playboy had lost its original exciting appeal in challenging societal norms to being criticized of creating even worse cultural norms. Playboys impact in society for the last 60+ years will always be remember in American culture in the 20th and 21st century as a pivotal role in challenging then being challenge for their idea of “the good life”.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samikhondker</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=File:Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_in_Modern_America.jpg&amp;diff=4331</id>
		<title>File:Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=File:Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_in_Modern_America.jpg&amp;diff=4331"/>
				<updated>2018-10-25T02:53:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samikhondker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samikhondker</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4330</id>
		<title>Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4330"/>
				<updated>2018-10-25T02:52:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samikhondker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox book&lt;br /&gt;
| name           = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America&lt;br /&gt;
| image          = [[File:Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America.jpg|200px|alt=Cover]]&lt;br /&gt;
| image_caption  = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America Book Cover&lt;br /&gt;
| author         = Elizabeth Fraterrigo&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher      = Oxford University Press&lt;br /&gt;
| pub_date       = October 8, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| pages          = 308 pages&lt;br /&gt;
| isbn           = 978-0199832453&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Playboy magazine is an icon in American culture when talking about sexuality. Notable actresses, singers, and other celebrities such as Marilyn Monroe, Pamela Anderson, Madonna, Farrah Fawcett, the late Anna Nicole Smith, and Kim Kardashian have graced the center folds of the magazine either nude or semi-nude while starting out or at the top of their careers. But Playboy magazine impact on American culture goes beyond just naked pictures of naked women men liked to look and fantasize about. Elizabeth Fraterrigo’s Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America explores and explains the impact Playboy magazine had not only on exploration of sexuality, but also how it challenged post war ideal of domestic bliss of the 1950s. Playboy magazine advocated for the pleasures of bachelorhood, working hard for play and leisure, living the “good life”, redefining gender roles, and enjoying pre-marital sex with sexually available women who were also not looking to settle down anytime soon either, all while criticizing the conformist ideals of a “happy” family life in the suburbs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraterrigo starts off with Hugh Hefner, the found of Playboy magazine, background. Like most men in who served in the war, Hefner eventually left military service at the age of 20, went to college, married his college sweetheart, moved into the suburbs with family after marriage and had a child with his wife. However, Hefner had an unsettling feeling of disappointment and unfulfillment in his life trying to conform to postwar societal standards. In the late 1940s and 50s, population growth and rise of subarea emphasis the importance of conforming to the new world of the Atomic age. The ideal mainstreamed happy life was to get married young, buy a house in the suburbs, have 2.5 children, men working a 9-5 office jobs while their wives stayed home to clean, and raise their children, and expected to have a warm cooked meal by 6 for her husband and kids. Those who did not follow this norm were looked down upon or shunned from society. However, many men and women, like Hefner, were unsatisfied with the constant cycle of uneventful domestic bliss. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually, Hefner was tired of working a desk job while his passion was to be a cartoonist for newspapers and magazines. Hefner published Playboy magazine in 1953, with the famous Marilyn Monroe as the first ever center-fold. While the magazine’s naked photos of Monroe and other playboy models shocked conservative members of society, those who looked past the pictures and read articles realized that Playboy wasn’t just promoting sexuality, but also individuality in a conformist society. Articles, advertisements, and pictures promoted the “good life”, where men worked and lived in the city, had taste in the finer things in life like good food, fashion, and interior designing and could entice any women with these skills into bed, like the famous James Bond. Men who worked hard enough could live this good life in the city because all the money he makes would be spent on himself and his own pleasure, promoting consumerism and helping the American economy. Also, the idea of being able to take home a beautiful woman to bed by using charm and taste in the finer thing seemed more appealing than stressing about going home to take care of a family. Playboy depicted the urban city life as a man’s world where suburbia became a women’s world, controlled by wives who threaten the power of masculinity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hefner challenge the taboo of the public discussion and expression of sexuality. Hefner’s target audience were young single men who had no plans to settle down but still wanted to enjoy the pleasures of sex. Playboy challenge against pre-marital sex was supported with the idea that sexual fulfillment will eventually lead to happier marriages when one is ready to settle down. With new scientific research and technology, pregnancy and STI weren’t huge concerns anymore, promoting the enjoyments of sex between men and women without worrying about any consequences. Helen Brown’s “Single Girl” was the equivalent to Hefner’s Playboy. The Single Girl was an independent woman with a career, who could take care of herself, sexually available, and was not looking to settle down and get married anytime soon. Instead, Brown insists the Single Girl’s role in society, and at work, was to be the sexual appeal for available and unavailable men. This new wave of feminist lead to women being open to freely their sexuality, and unapologetic using their sex appeal to get further in life, either for personal or professional reasons. However, as much the Single Girl was career oriented and independent, she was always supposed to be in a submissive role to men in the work force and society so they didn’t threaten the power of masculinity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually though, all good things come to an end. Playboy’s decline was aided criticisms of the lack of racial diversity, 3rd wave feminist, and decline sales. While the ideal of the good life seemed obtainable to white, middle class men in or recent graduated from college, black men did not have the same opportunities to try and reach the same life style. Discrimination against African Americans in society were still prominent in society, and minorities where not in the forefront of Hefner’s mind as a target audience. While there were some copycat magazines similar to Playboy meant for the black communities, none reach the same success and failed with a few years of publications. Critics also argued the lack of diversity in what kind of women were showcased in the magazine. Most playmates and cover girls were young, white women, with the occasional “exotic” model that was fitting in for some sort of fetish for men. Other critics were the new waves of feminist on the late 70s and 80s. These new wave feminists criticize Playboy for using women as sexual object and setting beauty standards that were unrealistic and unobtainable beauty and sexual standards to the modern women of America. The new Reagan-Era conservatism also criticize and blamed Playboy for influencing the rise of teen pregnancy, spreading of new STIs like AIDS, and higher rates of sexual violence against women, including the violent murder of Dorothy Stratten, a Playboy Playmate and Playmate of the Year, who died at the age of 20 by the hands of her husband and manager. With so much negative media and controversy surrounding Playboy, Hefner then attempting to appease the critics by changing certain things in the magazine. However, by then, Playboy had lost its original exciting appeal in challenging societal norms to being criticized of creating even worse cultural norms. Playboys impact in society for the last 60+ years will always be remember in American culture in the 20th and 21st century as a pivotal role in challenging then being challenge for their idea of “the good life”.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samikhondker</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4329</id>
		<title>Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4329"/>
				<updated>2018-10-25T02:51:25Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samikhondker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox book&lt;br /&gt;
| name           = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America&lt;br /&gt;
| image          = ]]&lt;br /&gt;
| image_caption  = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America Book Cover&lt;br /&gt;
| author         = Elizabeth Fraterrigo&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher      = Oxford University Press&lt;br /&gt;
| pub_date       = October 8, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| pages          = 308 pages&lt;br /&gt;
| isbn           = 978-0199832453&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Playboy magazine is an icon in American culture when talking about sexuality. Notable actresses, singers, and other celebrities such as Marilyn Monroe, Pamela Anderson, Madonna, Farrah Fawcett, the late Anna Nicole Smith, and Kim Kardashian have graced the center folds of the magazine either nude or semi-nude while starting out or at the top of their careers. But Playboy magazine impact on American culture goes beyond just naked pictures of naked women men liked to look and fantasize about. Elizabeth Fraterrigo’s Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America explores and explains the impact Playboy magazine had not only on exploration of sexuality, but also how it challenged post war ideal of domestic bliss of the 1950s. Playboy magazine advocated for the pleasures of bachelorhood, working hard for play and leisure, living the “good life”, redefining gender roles, and enjoying pre-marital sex with sexually available women who were also not looking to settle down anytime soon either, all while criticizing the conformist ideals of a “happy” family life in the suburbs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraterrigo starts off with Hugh Hefner, the found of Playboy magazine, background. Like most men in who served in the war, Hefner eventually left military service at the age of 20, went to college, married his college sweetheart, moved into the suburbs with family after marriage and had a child with his wife. However, Hefner had an unsettling feeling of disappointment and unfulfillment in his life trying to conform to postwar societal standards. In the late 1940s and 50s, population growth and rise of subarea emphasis the importance of conforming to the new world of the Atomic age. The ideal mainstreamed happy life was to get married young, buy a house in the suburbs, have 2.5 children, men working a 9-5 office jobs while their wives stayed home to clean, and raise their children, and expected to have a warm cooked meal by 6 for her husband and kids. Those who did not follow this norm were looked down upon or shunned from society. However, many men and women, like Hefner, were unsatisfied with the constant cycle of uneventful domestic bliss. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually, Hefner was tired of working a desk job while his passion was to be a cartoonist for newspapers and magazines. Hefner published Playboy magazine in 1953, with the famous Marilyn Monroe as the first ever center-fold. While the magazine’s naked photos of Monroe and other playboy models shocked conservative members of society, those who looked past the pictures and read articles realized that Playboy wasn’t just promoting sexuality, but also individuality in a conformist society. Articles, advertisements, and pictures promoted the “good life”, where men worked and lived in the city, had taste in the finer things in life like good food, fashion, and interior designing and could entice any women with these skills into bed, like the famous James Bond. Men who worked hard enough could live this good life in the city because all the money he makes would be spent on himself and his own pleasure, promoting consumerism and helping the American economy. Also, the idea of being able to take home a beautiful woman to bed by using charm and taste in the finer thing seemed more appealing than stressing about going home to take care of a family. Playboy depicted the urban city life as a man’s world where suburbia became a women’s world, controlled by wives who threaten the power of masculinity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hefner challenge the taboo of the public discussion and expression of sexuality. Hefner’s target audience were young single men who had no plans to settle down but still wanted to enjoy the pleasures of sex. Playboy challenge against pre-marital sex was supported with the idea that sexual fulfillment will eventually lead to happier marriages when one is ready to settle down. With new scientific research and technology, pregnancy and STI weren’t huge concerns anymore, promoting the enjoyments of sex between men and women without worrying about any consequences. Helen Brown’s “Single Girl” was the equivalent to Hefner’s Playboy. The Single Girl was an independent woman with a career, who could take care of herself, sexually available, and was not looking to settle down and get married anytime soon. Instead, Brown insists the Single Girl’s role in society, and at work, was to be the sexual appeal for available and unavailable men. This new wave of feminist lead to women being open to freely their sexuality, and unapologetic using their sex appeal to get further in life, either for personal or professional reasons. However, as much the Single Girl was career oriented and independent, she was always supposed to be in a submissive role to men in the work force and society so they didn’t threaten the power of masculinity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually though, all good things come to an end. Playboy’s decline was aided criticisms of the lack of racial diversity, 3rd wave feminist, and decline sales. While the ideal of the good life seemed obtainable to white, middle class men in or recent graduated from college, black men did not have the same opportunities to try and reach the same life style. Discrimination against African Americans in society were still prominent in society, and minorities where not in the forefront of Hefner’s mind as a target audience. While there were some copycat magazines similar to Playboy meant for the black communities, none reach the same success and failed with a few years of publications. Critics also argued the lack of diversity in what kind of women were showcased in the magazine. Most playmates and cover girls were young, white women, with the occasional “exotic” model that was fitting in for some sort of fetish for men. Other critics were the new waves of feminist on the late 70s and 80s. These new wave feminists criticize Playboy for using women as sexual object and setting beauty standards that were unrealistic and unobtainable beauty and sexual standards to the modern women of America. The new Reagan-Era conservatism also criticize and blamed Playboy for influencing the rise of teen pregnancy, spreading of new STIs like AIDS, and higher rates of sexual violence against women, including the violent murder of Dorothy Stratten, a Playboy Playmate and Playmate of the Year, who died at the age of 20 by the hands of her husband and manager. With so much negative media and controversy surrounding Playboy, Hefner then attempting to appease the critics by changing certain things in the magazine. However, by then, Playboy had lost its original exciting appeal in challenging societal norms to being criticized of creating even worse cultural norms. Playboys impact in society for the last 60+ years will always be remember in American culture in the 20th and 21st century as a pivotal role in challenging then being challenge for their idea of “the good life”.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samikhondker</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=File:Playbook_book_cover.jpg&amp;diff=4328</id>
		<title>File:Playbook book cover.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=File:Playbook_book_cover.jpg&amp;diff=4328"/>
				<updated>2018-10-25T02:48:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samikhondker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samikhondker</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America.jpg&amp;diff=4327</id>
		<title>Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America.jpg&amp;diff=4327"/>
				<updated>2018-10-25T02:47:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samikhondker: Created page with &amp;quot;File:playbook_book_cover.jpg&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:playbook_book_cover.jpg]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samikhondker</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4326</id>
		<title>Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4326"/>
				<updated>2018-10-25T02:46:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samikhondker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox book&lt;br /&gt;
| name           = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America&lt;br /&gt;
| image          = [[Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America.jpg|200px|alt=Cover]]&lt;br /&gt;
| image_caption  = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America Book Cover&lt;br /&gt;
| author         = Elizabeth Fraterrigo&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher      = Oxford University Press&lt;br /&gt;
| pub_date       = October 8, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| pages          = 308 pages&lt;br /&gt;
| isbn           = 978-0199832453&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
Playboy magazine is an icon in American culture when talking about sexuality. Notable actresses, singers, and other celebrities such as Marilyn Monroe, Pamela Anderson, Madonna, Farrah Fawcett, the late Anna Nicole Smith, and Kim Kardashian have graced the center folds of the magazine either nude or semi-nude while starting out or at the top of their careers. But Playboy magazine impact on American culture goes beyond just naked pictures of naked women men liked to look and fantasize about. Elizabeth Fraterrigo’s Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America explores and explains the impact Playboy magazine had not only on exploration of sexuality, but also how it challenged post war ideal of domestic bliss of the 1950s. Playboy magazine advocated for the pleasures of bachelorhood, working hard for play and leisure, living the “good life”, redefining gender roles, and enjoying pre-marital sex with sexually available women who were also not looking to settle down anytime soon either, all while criticizing the conformist ideals of a “happy” family life in the suburbs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fraterrigo starts off with Hugh Hefner, the found of Playboy magazine, background. Like most men in who served in the war, Hefner eventually left military service at the age of 20, went to college, married his college sweetheart, moved into the suburbs with family after marriage and had a child with his wife. However, Hefner had an unsettling feeling of disappointment and unfulfillment in his life trying to conform to postwar societal standards. In the late 1940s and 50s, population growth and rise of subarea emphasis the importance of conforming to the new world of the Atomic age. The ideal mainstreamed happy life was to get married young, buy a house in the suburbs, have 2.5 children, men working a 9-5 office jobs while their wives stayed home to clean, and raise their children, and expected to have a warm cooked meal by 6 for her husband and kids. Those who did not follow this norm were looked down upon or shunned from society. However, many men and women, like Hefner, were unsatisfied with the constant cycle of uneventful domestic bliss. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually, Hefner was tired of working a desk job while his passion was to be a cartoonist for newspapers and magazines. Hefner published Playboy magazine in 1953, with the famous Marilyn Monroe as the first ever center-fold. While the magazine’s naked photos of Monroe and other playboy models shocked conservative members of society, those who looked past the pictures and read articles realized that Playboy wasn’t just promoting sexuality, but also individuality in a conformist society. Articles, advertisements, and pictures promoted the “good life”, where men worked and lived in the city, had taste in the finer things in life like good food, fashion, and interior designing and could entice any women with these skills into bed, like the famous James Bond. Men who worked hard enough could live this good life in the city because all the money he makes would be spent on himself and his own pleasure, promoting consumerism and helping the American economy. Also, the idea of being able to take home a beautiful woman to bed by using charm and taste in the finer thing seemed more appealing than stressing about going home to take care of a family. Playboy depicted the urban city life as a man’s world where suburbia became a women’s world, controlled by wives who threaten the power of masculinity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hefner challenge the taboo of the public discussion and expression of sexuality. Hefner’s target audience were young single men who had no plans to settle down but still wanted to enjoy the pleasures of sex. Playboy challenge against pre-marital sex was supported with the idea that sexual fulfillment will eventually lead to happier marriages when one is ready to settle down. With new scientific research and technology, pregnancy and STI weren’t huge concerns anymore, promoting the enjoyments of sex between men and women without worrying about any consequences. Helen Brown’s “Single Girl” was the equivalent to Hefner’s Playboy. The Single Girl was an independent woman with a career, who could take care of herself, sexually available, and was not looking to settle down and get married anytime soon. Instead, Brown insists the Single Girl’s role in society, and at work, was to be the sexual appeal for available and unavailable men. This new wave of feminist lead to women being open to freely their sexuality, and unapologetic using their sex appeal to get further in life, either for personal or professional reasons. However, as much the Single Girl was career oriented and independent, she was always supposed to be in a submissive role to men in the work force and society so they didn’t threaten the power of masculinity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually though, all good things come to an end. Playboy’s decline was aided criticisms of the lack of racial diversity, 3rd wave feminist, and decline sales. While the ideal of the good life seemed obtainable to white, middle class men in or recent graduated from college, black men did not have the same opportunities to try and reach the same life style. Discrimination against African Americans in society were still prominent in society, and minorities where not in the forefront of Hefner’s mind as a target audience. While there were some copycat magazines similar to Playboy meant for the black communities, none reach the same success and failed with a few years of publications. Critics also argued the lack of diversity in what kind of women were showcased in the magazine. Most playmates and cover girls were young, white women, with the occasional “exotic” model that was fitting in for some sort of fetish for men. Other critics were the new waves of feminist on the late 70s and 80s. These new wave feminists criticize Playboy for using women as sexual object and setting beauty standards that were unrealistic and unobtainable beauty and sexual standards to the modern women of America. The new Reagan-Era conservatism also criticize and blamed Playboy for influencing the rise of teen pregnancy, spreading of new STIs like AIDS, and higher rates of sexual violence against women, including the violent murder of Dorothy Stratten, a Playboy Playmate and Playmate of the Year, who died at the age of 20 by the hands of her husband and manager. With so much negative media and controversy surrounding Playboy, Hefner then attempting to appease the critics by changing certain things in the magazine. However, by then, Playboy had lost its original exciting appeal in challenging societal norms to being criticized of creating even worse cultural norms. Playboys impact in society for the last 60+ years will always be remember in American culture in the 20th and 21st century as a pivotal role in challenging then being challenge for their idea of “the good life”.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samikhondker</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4325</id>
		<title>Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Playboy_and_the_Making_of_the_Good_Life_of_Modern_America&amp;diff=4325"/>
				<updated>2018-10-25T02:40:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samikhondker: Created page with &amp;quot;{{Infobox book | name           = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America | image          = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America.jpg|...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox book&lt;br /&gt;
| name           = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America&lt;br /&gt;
| image          = [[Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America.jpg|200px|alt=Cover]]&lt;br /&gt;
| image_caption  = Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America Book Cover&lt;br /&gt;
| author         = Elizabeth Fraterrigo&lt;br /&gt;
| publisher      = Oxford University Press&lt;br /&gt;
| pub_date       = October 8, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
| pages          = 308 pages&lt;br /&gt;
| isbn           = 978-0199832453&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Playboy magazine is an icon in American culture when talking about sexuality. Notable actresses, singers, and other celebrities such as Marilyn Monroe, Pamela Anderson, Madonna, Farrah Fawcett, the late Anna Nicole Smith, and Kim Kardashian have graced the center folds of the magazine either nude or semi-nude while starting out or at the top of their careers. But Playboy magazine impact on American culture goes beyond just naked pictures of naked women men liked to look and fantasize about. Elizabeth Fraterrigo’s Playboy and the Making of the Good Life in Modern America explores and explains the impact Playboy magazine had not only on exploration of sexuality, but also how it challenged post war ideal of domestic bliss of the 1950s. Playboy magazine advocated for the pleasures of bachelorhood, working hard for play and leisure, living the “good life”, redefining gender roles, and enjoying pre-marital sex with sexually available women who were also not looking to settle down anytime soon either, all while criticizing the conformist ideals of a “happy” family life in the suburbs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Fraterrigo starts off with Hugh Hefner, the found of Playboy magazine, background. Like most men in who served in the war, Hefner eventually left military service at the age of 20, went to college, married his college sweetheart, moved into the suburbs with family after marriage and had a child with his wife. However, Hefner had an unsettling feeling of disappointment and unfulfillment in his life trying to conform to postwar societal standards. In the late 1940s and 50s, population growth and rise of subarea emphasis the importance of conforming to the new world of the Atomic age. The ideal mainstreamed happy life was to get married young, buy a house in the suburbs, have 2.5 children, men working a 9-5 office jobs while their wives stayed home to clean, and raise their children, and expected to have a warm cooked meal by 6 for her husband and kids. Those who did not follow this norm were looked down upon or shunned from society. However, many men and women, like Hefner, were unsatisfied with the constant cycle of uneventful domestic bliss. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Eventually, Hefner was tired of working a desk job while his passion was to be a cartoonist for newspapers and magazines. Hefner published Playboy magazine in 1953, with the famous Marilyn Monroe as the first ever center-fold. While the magazine’s naked photos of Monroe and other playboy models shocked conservative members of society, those who looked past the pictures and read articles realized that Playboy wasn’t just promoting sexuality, but also individuality in a conformist society. Articles, advertisements, and pictures promoted the “good life”, where men worked and lived in the city, had taste in the finer things in life like good food, fashion, and interior designing and could entice any women with these skills into bed, like the famous James Bond. Men who worked hard enough could live this good life in the city because all the money he makes would be spent on himself and his own pleasure, promoting consumerism and helping the American economy. Also, the idea of being able to take home a beautiful woman to bed by using charm and taste in the finer thing seemed more appealing than stressing about going home to take care of a family. Playboy depicted the urban city life as a man’s world where suburbia became a women’s world, controlled by wives who threaten the power of masculinity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Hefner challenge the taboo of the public discussion and expression of sexuality. Hefner’s target audience were young single men who had no plans to settle down but still wanted to enjoy the pleasures of sex. Playboy challenge against pre-marital sex was supported with the idea that sexual fulfillment will eventually lead to happier marriages when one is ready to settle down. With new scientific research and technology, pregnancy and STI weren’t huge concerns anymore, promoting the enjoyments of sex between men and women without worrying about any consequences. Helen Brown’s “Single Girl” was the equivalent to Hefner’s Playboy. The Single Girl was an independent woman with a career, who could take care of herself, sexually available, and was not looking to settle down and get married anytime soon. Instead, Brown insists the Single Girl’s role in society, and at work, was to be the sexual appeal for available and unavailable men. This new wave of feminist lead to women being open to freely their sexuality, and unapologetic using their sex appeal to get further in life, either for personal or professional reasons. However, as much the Single Girl was career oriented and independent, she was always supposed to be in a submissive role to men in the work force and society so they didn’t threaten the power of masculinity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
	Eventually though, all good things come to an end. Playboy’s decline was aided criticisms of the lack of racial diversity, 3rd wave feminist, and decline sales. While the ideal of the good life seemed obtainable to white, middle class men in or recent graduated from college, black men did not have the same opportunities to try and reach the same life style. Discrimination against African Americans in society were still prominent in society, and minorities where not in the forefront of Hefner’s mind as a target audience. While there were some copycat magazines similar to Playboy meant for the black communities, none reach the same success and failed with a few years of publications. Critics also argued the lack of diversity in what kind of women were showcased in the magazine. Most playmates and cover girls were young, white women, with the occasional “exotic” model that was fitting in for some sort of fetish for men. Other critics were the new waves of feminist on the late 70s and 80s. These new wave feminists criticize Playboy for using women as sexual object and setting beauty standards that were unrealistic and unobtainable beauty and sexual standards to the modern women of America. The new Reagan-Era conservatism also criticize and blamed Playboy for influencing the rise of teen pregnancy, spreading of new STIs like AIDS, and higher rates of sexual violence against women, including the violent murder of Dorothy Stratten, a Playboy Playmate and Playmate of the Year, who died at the age of 20 by the hands of her husband and manager. With so much negative media and controversy surrounding Playboy, Hefner then attempting to appease the critics by changing certain things in the magazine. However, by then, Playboy had lost its original exciting appeal in challenging societal norms to being criticized of creating even worse cultural norms. Playboys impact in society for the last 60+ years will always be remember in American culture in the 20th and 21st century as a pivotal role in challenging then being challenge for their idea of “the good life”.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samikhondker</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Twentieth_Century_United_States&amp;diff=4286</id>
		<title>Twentieth Century United States</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.videri.org/index.php?title=Twentieth_Century_United_States&amp;diff=4286"/>
				<updated>2018-10-22T21:45:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Samikhondker: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Book Summaries==&lt;br /&gt;
* Donna Alvah. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2010/12/29/women-and-children-first-the-importance-of-gender-and-military-families-in-the-cold-war-era/ Unofficial Ambassadors: American Military Families Overseas and the Cold War, 1946-1965] (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
* Luis Alvarez. [[The Power of the Zoot|The Power of the Zoot: Youth Culture and Resistance during World War II]] (2008). &lt;br /&gt;
* Karen Anderson. [[Wartime Women|Wartime Women: Sex Roles, Family Relations, and the Status of Women During World War II]] (1981). &lt;br /&gt;
* Michael Aronson. [[Nickelodeon City|Nickelodeon City: Pittsburgh at the Movies, 1905-1929]] (2008).&lt;br /&gt;
* Eric Avila. [[Popular Culture in the Age of White Flight|Popular Culture in the Age of White Flight: Fear and Fantasy in Suburban Los Angeles]] (2004). &lt;br /&gt;
* Beth Bailey. [[America’s Army|America’s Army: Making the All-Volunteer Force]] (2009). &lt;br /&gt;
* Beth Bailey &amp;amp; David Farber. [[The First Strange Place|The First Strange Place: The Alchemy of Race and Sex in World War II Hawaii]] (1992). &lt;br /&gt;
* Beth Bailey. [[From Front Porch to Back Seat|From Front Porch to Back Seat: Courtship in Twentieth-Century America]] (1989).&lt;br /&gt;
* Mark Brilliant. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2012/11/29/californication-race-ethnicity-and-unity-in-twentieth-century-california/ Californication: Race, Ethnicity, and Unity in Twentieth Century California] (2012). &lt;br /&gt;
* Amy Bridges. [[Morning Glories]] (1999). &lt;br /&gt;
* Laura Briggs. [[Reproducing Empire|Reproducing Empire: Race, Sex, Science, and U.S. Imperialism in Puerto Rico]] (2002). &lt;br /&gt;
* Alan Brinkley. [[Voices of Protest|Voices of Protest: Huey Long, Father Coughlin, &amp;amp; the Great Depression]] (1983). &lt;br /&gt;
* Charlotte Brooks. [[Alien Neighbors, Foreign Friends|Alien Neighbors, Foreign Friends: Asian Americans, Housing, and the Transformation of Urban California]] (2009).&lt;br /&gt;
* William Fitzhugh Brundage. [[The Southern Past|The Southern Past: a Clash of Race and Memory]] (2005). &lt;br /&gt;
* Catherine Fisher Collins. [[The Imprisonment of African American Women| The Imprisonment of African American Women: Causes, Conditions, and Future Implications]] (1997). &lt;br /&gt;
* Robert Caro. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2011/08/12/dog-days-classics-robert-caros-controversial-portrait-of-robert-moses-and-new-york/ The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York](1974)&lt;br /&gt;
* Ta-Nehisi Coates. [[We Were Eight Years in Power: An American Tragedy]] (2017).&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Cohen and Elizabeth Taylor. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/dog-days-classics-political-boss-and-midwestern-pharaoh-richard-j-daleys-chicago-legacy/ American Pharaoh: Mayor Richard J. Daley - His Battle for the Nation and Chicago] (2001)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lizabeth Cohen. [[A Consumers’ Republic|A Consumers’ Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America]] (2003). &lt;br /&gt;
* Lizabeth Cohen. [[Making a New Deal|Making a New Deal: Industrial Workers in Chicago, 1919-1939]] (2008). &lt;br /&gt;
* Stephanie Coontz. [[The Way We Never Were|The Way We Never Were: American Families and the Nostalgia Trap]] (1992).&lt;br /&gt;
* Nancy F. Cott. [[Public Vows|Public Vows: A History of Marriage and the Nation]] (2002). &lt;br /&gt;
* Alfred W. Crosby. [[America&amp;#039;s Forgotten Pandemic|America&amp;#039;s Forgotten Pandemic: The Influenza of 1918]] (2003). &lt;br /&gt;
* Pete Daniel, [[Lost Revolutions|Lost Revolutions: The South in the 1950s]] (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Davis. [[City of Quartz|City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles]] (2006). &lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Davis &amp;amp; Michael Sprinker. [[Magical Urbanism|Magical Urbanism: Latinos Reinvent the US Big City]] (2001). &lt;br /&gt;
* Michael J. Dear. [[The Postmodern Urban Condition]] (2001). &lt;br /&gt;
* Robert C. Donnelly. [[Dark Rose]] (2011). &lt;br /&gt;
* Steven Erie. [[Globalizing L.A.|Globalizing L.A.: Trade, Infrastructure, and Regional Development]] (2004). &lt;br /&gt;
* Steven P. Erie. [[Beyond Chinatown|Beyond Chinatown: The Metropolitan Water District, Growth, and the Environment in Southern California]] (2006). &lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Ewen. [[Immigrant Women in the Land of Dollars]] (1985). &lt;br /&gt;
* Dannelly Farrow. [[Dixie&amp;#039;s Daughters]] (2003).&lt;br /&gt;
* Barbara Ferman. [[Challenging the Growth Machine|Challenging the Growth Machine: Neighborhood Politics in Chicago and Pittsburgh]] (1996). &lt;br /&gt;
* Marcie Ferris and Mark Greenberg. [[Jewish Roots in Southern Soil|Jewish Roots in Southern Soil: A New History]] (2006). &lt;br /&gt;
* John M. Findlay. [[Magic Lands|Magic Lands: Western Cityscapes and American Culture After 1940]] (1993).&lt;br /&gt;
* Robert Frank. [[The Americans|The Americans: Photographs by Robert Frank Introduction by Jack Kerouac]] (1958).&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Fraterrigo [[Playboy and the Making of the Good Life of Modern America]] (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Christina Greene. [[Our Separate Ways|Our Separate Ways: Women and the Black Freedom Movement in Durham, North Carolina]] (2005). &lt;br /&gt;
* Steven Gregory. [[Black Corona|Black Corona: Race and the Politics of Place in an Urban Community]] (1999). &lt;br /&gt;
* Jason Hackworth. [[The Neoliberal City|The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism]] (2006). &lt;br /&gt;
* William Ivy Hair. [[Carnival of Fury|Carnival of Fury: Robert Charles and the New Orleans Race Riot of 1900]] (2008).&lt;br /&gt;
* Tona J. Hangen.  [[Redeeming the Dial|Redeeming the Dial: Radio, Religion, and Popular Culture in America]]  (2013). &lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Hartman. [[A War for the Soul of America: A History of the Culture Wars]] (2015)&lt;br /&gt;
* Chester W. Hartman. [[Yerba Buena|Yerba Buena: land grab and community resistance in San Francisco,]] (1974). &lt;br /&gt;
* Georgina Hickey. [[Hope and Danger in the New South City|Hope and Danger in the New South City: Working-Class Women and Urban Development in Atlanta, 1890-1940]] (2005). &lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Hofstadter. [[The American Political Tradition|The American Political Tradition: And the Men Who Made it]] (1989). &lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Hofstadter. [[Social Darwinism in American Thought]] (1994).&lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Horowitz. [[Betty Friedan and the Making of “The Feminine Mystique”|Betty Friedan and the Making of “The Feminine Mystique”: The American Left, the Cold War, and Modern Feminism]] (2000).&lt;br /&gt;
* John A. Jakle and Keith A. Sculle. [[Lots of Parking|Lots of Parking: Land Use in a Car Culture]] (2004). &lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Martinez HoSang. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2011/10/06/erasing-race-whiteness-california-and-the-colorblind-bind/ Racial Propositions: Ballot Initiatives and the Making of Postwar California](2010)&lt;br /&gt;
* Benjamin Hufbauer. [[Presidential Temples: How Memorials and Libraries Shape Public Memory]] (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
* Jonathan Hughes (Editor)&amp;amp; Simon Sadler (Editor).[[Non-Plan|Non-Plan: Essays on Freedom, Participation and Change in Modern Architecture and Urbanism]] (2000). &lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel Hurewitz. [[Bohemian Los Angeles|Bohemian Los Angeles: and the Making of Modern Politics]] (2007). &lt;br /&gt;
* Marilynn S. Johnson. [[The Second Gold Rush|The Second Gold Rush: Oakland and the East Bay in World War II]] (1994). &lt;br /&gt;
* Sharon Foster Jones. [[Atlanta&amp;#039;s Ponce de Leon Avenue: A History]] (2012)&lt;br /&gt;
* Tony Judt. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2011/01/24/neoliberalisms-license-to-ill/ Ill Fares the Land] (2011).&lt;br /&gt;
* Lucy Kaylin. [[For the Love of God | For the Love of God: The Faith and Future of the American Nun]] (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
*Kempton, Willet [[Environmental Values in American Culture]] (1999) &lt;br /&gt;
* Larry D. Kramer. [[The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review]] (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
* Joel Kotkin. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2011/03/23/americas-ace-in-the-hole-is-of-course-its-awesomeness/ The Next Hundred Million:America in 2050] (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
* Kevin M. Kruse. [[White Flight|White Flight: Atlanta and the Making of Modern Conservatism]] (2007). &lt;br /&gt;
* Matthew D. Lassiter. [[The Silent Majority|The Silent Majority: Suburban Politics in the Sunbelt South]] (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
* Tim Lawrence. [[Life and Death on the New York Dance Floor 1980-1983|Life and Death on the New York Dance Floor 1980-83]] (2016).&lt;br /&gt;
*Gary L. Lehring. [[Officially Gay|The Political Construction of Sexuality by the U. S. Military]] (2003).&lt;br /&gt;
* William R. Leach. [[Land of Desire|Land of Desire: Merchants, Power, and the Rise of a New American Culture]] (1994). &lt;br /&gt;
* Michael F. Logan. [[Fighting Sprawl and City Hall|Fighting Sprawl and City Hall: Resistance to Urban Growth in the Southwest]] (1995). &lt;br /&gt;
* Fredrik Logevall. [[Choosing War|Choosing War: The Lost Chance for Peace and the Escalation of War in Vietnam]] (1999). &lt;br /&gt;
* Roger W. Lotchin. [[Fortress California, 1910-1961|Fortress California, 1910-1961: From Warfare to Welfare]] (2002). &lt;br /&gt;
* Lisa Lowe. [[Immigrant Acts|Immigrant Acts: On Asian American Cultural Politics]] (1996). &lt;br /&gt;
* Robert S. Lynd &amp;amp; Helen Merrell Lynd. [[Middletown|Middletown: A Study in Modern American Culture]] (1959).&lt;br /&gt;
* Catherine Lutz. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/3187/ Homefront: A Military City and the American 20th Century] (2001). &lt;br /&gt;
* Nancy MacLean. [[Freedom Is Not Enough|Freedom Is Not Enough: The Opening of the American Workplace]] (2008). &lt;br /&gt;
* John Markoff. [[What the Dormouse Said|What the Dorm Mouse Said: How the Sixties Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer Indsutry]] (2005). &lt;br /&gt;
* Isaac Martin. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2011/05/04/stalking-the-tax-man-the-pervasive-influence-of-the-property-tax-revolt/ The Permanent Tax Revolt: How Property Tax Transformed America] (2008).&lt;br /&gt;
* Douglas Massey &amp;amp; Nancy Denton. [[American Apartheid|American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass]] (1993). &lt;br /&gt;
* Elaine Tyler May. [[America and The Pill|America and The Pill: A History of Promise, Peril, and Liberation]] (2010). &lt;br /&gt;
* Carol Lynn McKibben. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/3187/ Racial Beachhead: Diversity and Democracy in a Military Town] (2012).&lt;br /&gt;
* Lisa McGirr. [[Suburban Warriors|Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right]] (2002). &lt;br /&gt;
* James Miller. [[Flowers in the Dustbin|Flowers in the Dustbin: The Rise of Rock and Roll, 1947-1977]] (2000). &lt;br /&gt;
* Glen M. Mimura. [[Ghostlife of the Third Cinema|Ghostlife of Third Cinema: Asian American Film and Video]] (2009). &lt;br /&gt;
* John Hull Mollenkopf. [[The Contested City]] (1983). &lt;br /&gt;
* Maggi M. Morehouse.  [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/double-victory-from-wwii-to-the-avf-african-americans-and-the-u-s-military/ Fighting in the Jim Crow Army: Black Man and Women Remember World War II] (2000).&lt;br /&gt;
* Edward P. Morgan. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2013/01/14/a-mediating-mess-how-american-post-wwii-media-undermined-democracy/ What Really Happened to the Sixties: How Mass Media Culture Failed American Democracy] (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
* Charles Moskos Jr. and John Sibley Butler. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/double-victory-from-wwii-to-the-avf-african-americans-and-the-u-s-military/ All That We Can Be: Black Leadership and Racial Integration the Army Way] (1996).&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew H. Myers. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2012/05/26/3187/ Black, White, and Olive Drab: Racial Integration at Fort Jackson, South Carolina and the Civil Rights Movement] (2006).&lt;br /&gt;
* Mae Ngai. [[Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America]] (2014). &lt;br /&gt;
* Armando Navarro. [[The Cristal Experiment|The Cristal Experiment: A Chicano Struggle for Community Control]] (1998). &lt;br /&gt;
* Becky M. Nicolaides. [[My Blue Heaven|My Blue Heaven: Life and Politics in the Working-Class Suburbs of Los Angeles, 1920-1965]] (2002). &lt;br /&gt;
* Carol Padden and Tom Humphries. [[Deaf in America|Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture]](1988).&lt;br /&gt;
* Anthony M. Petro.  [[After the Wrath of God: AIDS, Sexuality, and American Religion]] (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
* Margaret Pugh O’Mara. [[Cities of Knowledge|Cities of Knowledge: Cold War Science and the Search for the Next Silicon Valley]] (2004). &lt;br /&gt;
* Gilbert Osofsky. [[Harlem|Harlem: The Making of a Ghetto : Negro New York, 1890-1930]] (1996). &lt;br /&gt;
* Rick Perlstein. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2011/09/15/essence-precedes-existence-the-problem-of-identity-politics-in-hurewitzs-bohemian-la/ Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America](2009).&lt;br /&gt;
* Patrick Phillips. [[Blood at the Root|Blood at the Root: Racial Cleansing in America]] (2016).&lt;br /&gt;
* Rebecca Jo Plant. [[Mom|Mom: The Transformation of Motherhood in Modern America]] (2012). &lt;br /&gt;
* Brenda Gayle Plummer. [[Window on Freedom|Window on Freedom: Race, Civil Rights, and Foreign Affairs, 1945-1988]] (2003).&lt;br /&gt;
* Jerald E. Podair. [[The Strike that Changed New York|The Strike that Changed New York: Blacks, Whites, and the Ocean Hill-Brownsville Crisis]] (2002).&lt;br /&gt;
* Doris Marie Provine. [[Unequal Under Law|Unequal Under Law: Race in the War on Drugs]] (2007). &lt;br /&gt;
* Daniel T. Rodgers. [[Contested Truths|Contested Truths: Keywords in American Politics Since Independence]] (1998). &lt;br /&gt;
* David Roediger. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2012/08/30/dog-days-classics-the-wages-of-whiteness-and-the-white-people-who-love-them/ The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class] (1991).&lt;br /&gt;
* David Roediger. [[Working Toward Whiteness|Working Toward Whiteness: How America&amp;#039;s Immigrants Became White: The Strange Journey from Ellis Island to the Suburbs]] (2005)&lt;br /&gt;
* Adam Rome. [[The Bulldozer in the Countryside|The Bulldozer in the Countryside: Suburban Sprawl and the Rise of American Environmentalism]] (2001). &lt;br /&gt;
* Richard Ronald. [[The Ideology of Home Ownership|The Ideology of Home Ownership: Homeowner Societies and the Role of Housing]] (2008). &lt;br /&gt;
* Jake Rosenfeld. [[What Unions No Longer Do]] (2014). &lt;br /&gt;
* Peter Henry Rossi &amp;amp; Robert A. Dentler. [[The Politics of Urban Renewal|The Politics of Urban Renewal: The Chicago Findings]] (1981).&lt;br /&gt;
* Sheila Rowbotham [[Dreamers of a New Day|Dreamers of a New Day: Women Who Invented the Twentieth Century]] (2010).&lt;br /&gt;
* Mike Royko. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2011/08/18/dog-days-classics-political-boss-and-midwestern-pharaoh-richard-j-daleys-chicago-legacy/ Boss: Richard J. Daley of Chicago] (1971)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Roger Sanjek. [[The Future of Us All|The Future of Us All: Race and Neighborhood Politics in New York City]] (1998).&lt;br /&gt;
* Jennifer Scanlon. [[Bad Girls Go Everywhere: The Life of Helen Gurley Brown, the Woman Behind Cosmopolitan Magazine]] (2009). &lt;br /&gt;
* Bruce Schulman &amp;amp; Bruce J. Schulman. [[The Seventies|The Seventies: The Great Shift In American Culture, Society, And Politics]] (2002). &lt;br /&gt;
* Joel Schwartz. [[The New York Approach|The New York Approach: Robert Moses, Urban Liberals, and Redevelopment of the Inner City]] (1993).&lt;br /&gt;
*Gary S. Selby [[Martin Luther King and the Rhetoric of Freedom: The Exodus Narrative in America&amp;#039;s Struggle for Civil Rights]] (2008)&lt;br /&gt;
* Josh Sides. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2012/11/20/making-san-francisco-josh-sides-erotic-city/ Erotic City: Sexual Revolutions and the Making of Modern San Francisco] (2009). &lt;br /&gt;
* Nayan Shah. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2012/03/07/intimate-citizenship-the-influence-of-marriage-sexuality-and-transience-on-national-membership/Stranger Intimacy:Contesting Race, Sexuality and Law in the American Northwest] (2012). &lt;br /&gt;
* David J. Silbey. [[A War of Frontier and Empire: The Philippine-American War, 1899-1902]] (2007).&lt;br /&gt;
* Rickie Solinger. [[Beggars and Choosers|Beggars and Choosers: How the Politics of Choice Shapes Adoption, Abortion, and Welfare in the United States]] (2002). &lt;br /&gt;
* Allan H. Spear. [[Black Chicago|Black Chicago: The Making of a Negro Ghetto, 1890-1920]] (1969)&lt;br /&gt;
* Dawn Spring. [[Advertising in the Age of Persuasion|Advertising in the Age of Persuasion: Building Brand America, 1941-1961]] (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
* Ann Laura Stoler. [[Haunted by Empire|Haunted by Empire: Geographies of Intimacy in North American History]] (2006). &lt;br /&gt;
* Todd Swanstrom. [[The Crisis of Growth Politics|The Crisis of Growth Politics: Cleveland, Kucinich, and the Challenge of Urban Populism]] (1988). &lt;br /&gt;
* Ronald Takaki. [[Hiroshima|Hiroshima: Why America Dropped the Atomic Bomb]] (1996). &lt;br /&gt;
* Penny M. Von Eschen. [[Satchmo Blows Up The World|Satchmo Blows Up The World: Jazz Ambassadors Play The Cold War]] (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
* Robert Wiebe. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/dog-day-classics-robert-h-wiebe-and-the-search-for-order/ The Search for Order, 1877 - 1920] (1967).&lt;br /&gt;
* Andrew Wiese. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2011/01/16/getting-to-the-mountaintop-the-suburban-dreams-of-african-americans/ Places of Their Own: African American Suburbanization in the Twentieth Century] (2004)&lt;br /&gt;
* Rhonda Y. Williams. [[The Politics of Public Housing|The Politics of Public Housing: Black Women’s Struggles Against Urban Inequality]] (2004). &lt;br /&gt;
* William Appleman Williams. [[The Tragedy of American Diplomacy]] (2009).&lt;br /&gt;
* Gwendolyn Wright. [[Building the Dream|Building the Dream: A Social History of Housing in America]] (1983).&lt;br /&gt;
*Yellin, Emily [[Our Mothers&amp;#039; War]] (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
*Young B. Marilyn. [[The Vietnam Wars|The Vietnam Wars 1945-1990]] (1991).&lt;br /&gt;
*Zimmerman, Andrew. [http://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2011/09/26/the-ties-that-bind-the-transnational-trick-of-immobilizing-the-mobile/ Alabama in Africa: Booker T. Washington, the German Empire, and the Globalization of the New South] (2010).&lt;br /&gt;
*Washington Harriet. [[Medical Apartheid|Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present]] (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
*Aviva Chomsky. [[Linked Labor Histories| Linked Labor Histories : New England, Colombia, and the Making of a Global Working Class]] (2008 .&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Samikhondker</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>